nac national standards project findings and conclusions

Currently, ASD prevalence is 1 to 54 children. Interventions that aim at strengthening behaviors that are in deficit and at weaking behaviors that might harm global functioning can help supersede common issues that might derive from the disorder.Īccording to the latest studies from the Center for Disease Control (CDC) (Maenner et al., 2020), the prevalence for ASD is increasing in some geographic areas from USA. The diagnostic classification autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (American Psychiatric Association, 2013 World Health Organization, 2019 ) is mostly attributed to people whose behavioral repertoire is characterized by deficits in social communication learning and by difficulties to exhibit behavior variability. Some additional issues and the study limitations are also presented. This manuscript discusses the need for (a) expanding the analysis beyond the evidence identified by different researchers and organizations such as the clearinghouses, (b) proposing interventions that are based not only on scientific evidence but also on social validity - which is directed by client idiosyncrasies, and (c) attention to the fact that EBPs should not be seen as static information regarding interventions with empirical support: evidence-based practices are the result of constant analysis of the intervention implementation data added to professional training and client values and context. The different criteria for evaluating evidence and for classifying the interventions (once evidence was evaluated) were identified and described. The criteria for evaluating evidence, as defined by these documents, contained specific components or quality indicators for each type of study design. Data sources used in this analysis were reports and articles elaborated by different clearinghouses (i.e., National Autism Center, National Professional Development Center, and the National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice).

The aim of this study was to conduct a narrative literature review to identify differences and similarities in evidence-evaluation criteria for group and single-subject designs that empirically support interventions for people with ASD. The Behavioral Intervention category consists of applied behavior analytic interventions to increase adaptive behaviors and decrease challenging behaviors.Recommendations for using evidence-based practices have become increasingly common in services for individuals diagnosed with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD). Increasingly, a broad range of fields (e.g., developmental psychology, special education, speech-language pathology) are making contributions to the autism literature, so this trend may change over time.įOR ADULTS: The only intervention to be identified as Established for individuals ages 22 years and older is Behavioral Interventions. Most of the interventions identified above come from the behavioral literature (including applied behavior analysis, behavioral psychology, and positive behavior supports).

Comprehensive Behavioral Treatment for Young Children.

Cognitive Behavioral Intervention Package.

The 14 Established Interventions for children, adolescents, and young adults (under 22 years of age) identified in the National Standards Report, Phase 2 (2015) are:

We recommend considering these interventions unless they are deemed inappropriate based on one of the other factors influencing treatment selection. The National Standards Project of the National Autism Center has identified interventions that have sufficient evidence to show they are effective for individuals with ASD. (d) capacity to accurately implement an intervention. (c) values and preferences of families (including the individual on the autism spectrum) (b) professional judgment and data-based clinical decision making (a) evidence of intervention effectiveness The following factors should influence intervention selection: Selecting the most appropriate intervention for an individual with ASD is complicated. Autism Interventions What interventions are recommended?

Nac national standards project findings and conclusions